<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Write - Number 46: Charlie Craig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whywewriteseries.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/why-we-write-number-46-charlie-craig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whywewriteseries.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/why-we-write-number-46-charlie-craig/</link>
	<description>Born of the Strike.  From Writers, for Writers.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://whywewriteseries.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/why-we-write-number-46-charlie-craig/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywewriteseries.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Gosh, Charlie. Your "Why We Write" is &lt;i&gt;waaaaaaaaay"&lt;/i&gt; better than mine, I can see why you didn't want my little crappy true-life essay tainting such fine stories.

But thanks for including Tom Flynn's sentence in your compilation (number 43) essay grouping. I told him you hated mine, but &lt;i&gt;loved&lt;/i&gt; his. He was pleased as hell and I'm jealous as shit.

See you on the picket line...&lt;i&gt;ummmmm&lt;/i&gt;...I guess not. My mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, Charlie. Your &#8220;Why We Write&#8221; is <i>waaaaaaaaay&#8221;</i> better than mine, I can see why you didn&#8217;t want my little crappy true-life essay tainting such fine stories.</p>
<p>But thanks for including Tom Flynn&#8217;s sentence in your compilation (number 43) essay grouping. I told him you hated mine, but <i>loved</i> his. He was pleased as hell and I&#8217;m jealous as shit.</p>
<p>See you on the picket line&#8230;<i>ummmmm</i>&#8230;I guess not. My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
